Star striker's World Cup drug ban enrages South American nation

0
69


Thousands have taken to the streets of Peru in protest and three rival national team captains have signed a letter calling for leniency in the case of the Peruvian forward Paolo Guerrero.

Peru’s all-time top scorer is presently banned from the Russia 2018 World Cup after testing positive for the cocaine metabolite benzoylecgonine, following a World Cup qualifying match away to Argentina in October 2017.

Initially banned for a year by FIFA — the substance is on the World Anti-Doping Agency’s prohibited list — Guerrero protested his innocence, contending the metabolite was only found in his system as a consequence of a simple cup of coca tea, a common drink in South America.

In court, Guerrero’s lawyers invoked the story of three Inca mummies — the Children of Llullaillaco — discovered by mountaineers in 1999.

The mummies’ perfectly-preserved bodies had gone undisturbed since the 16th Century and contained traces of the same substance — despite cocaine only being isolated as psychoactive alkaloid hundreds of years later.

If the metabolite could hang around on a person for centuries before cocaine even existed, surely, the lawyers argued, an adverse finding in Guerrero’s case wasn’t so unusual.

The player posted on his Facebook page in November: “I trust that the truth will soon be known and I will return to the fields to defend with soul and heart the colors of my country.”

On 20 December 2017, FIFA reduced Guerrero’s ban to what it considered a “proportionate sanction” of six months, meaning Peru’s talismanic captain would get a chance to play in the World Cup.

Job done, or so it appeared, as Peru manager Ricardo Gareca named the 34-year-old in his provisional squad on May 14.

Except Guerrero took his case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) to have his innocence proved once and for all — a decision that has proved to be his undoing as the Swiss body decided to increase Guerrero suspension from six to 14 months.

CAS accepted that Guerrero “did not attempt to enhance his performance by ingesting the prohibited substance,” adding there was no “significant fault or negligence,” but the court’s panel insisted the player could have taken measures to prevent the violation.

Rivals join forces

It’s a decision that has prompted uproar in his native country and beyond.

Newly-appointed president Martin Vizcarra vowed to support Guerrero’s case, lobbying the Peruvian embassy in Switzerland.

Thousands have taken to the streets of Lima in protest, culminating in a show of unity at the Estadio Nacional.

Thousands crowded onto the streets of Lima donned in Peru’s national colors with placards and banners protesting Guerrero’s innocence.

FIFPro, the sports world players’ union, called for an “urgent” meeting with FIFA, calling the ban “unfair and disproportionate.”

Peru's Argentine coach Ricardo Gareca protests the 14-month sanction in a press conference.

Hugo Lloris, Mile Jedinak and Simon Kjaer — captains of France, Australia and Denmark respectively — signed a letter dated May 21 calling for FIFA to show “compassion” and “temporarily interrupt” the ban.

“Peru is returning to football’s ultimate stage after a 36-year absence and we believe Paolo Guerrero should be allowed to lead his nation and celebrate what will be a career highlight,” says the letter, addressed to the FIFA General Secretariat.

“We turn to the FIFA Council and kindly put forward an urgent request for clemency by asking the FIFA Council to temporarily interrupt the ban imposed on Paolo Guerrero during the 2018 World Cup in Russia, with the suspension to recommence at the conclusion of Peru’s participation in the competition.”

An audience with Infantino

Guerrero, nicknamed the “Warrior,” certainly isn’t going down without a fight.

On Tuesday, the striker and Peru Football Federation president Edwin Oviedo flew to Zurich for a personal meeting with FIFA president Gianni Infantino.

In a video published on his Facebook page, the player thanked the legions of Peruvians that supported his cause and said he aimed to return from Switzerland with “good news.”

But, while Infantino expressed his “deep understanding of Guerrero’s disappointment,” a FIFA spokesperson told CNN the meeting would have “no impact” on the final decision, because the sanction had been imposed by CAS “after an appeal lodged against a decision of an independent FIFA judicial body.”

It’s unclear where that leaves the 34-year-old striker’s World Cup hopes, with his lawyer yet to respond for CNN’s request for comment.

‘Trapped in the pitfalls of the system’

The wider implications of the case nonetheless could be significant, according to FIFPro.

“The current anti-doping system requires reforms on different fronts,” Director of Policy and Strategic Affairs, Jonas Baer-Hoffman, told CNN Tuesday.

Peru's Raul Ruidiaz, Jefferson Farfan and Miguel Trauco hold aloft Guerrero's jersey during his absence.

“The last years have proven that the system is ineffective and at the same time very invasive to the rights of athletes, who too often get trapped in the unjust pitfalls of the system. Athletes should be the first stakeholder to build a system for a clean sport.

“We fail to see the purpose and benefit for our sport of such a sanction. The tribunals recognized there was no intent by Paolo Guerrero to cheat. Mandatory sanctions, with such severe consequences, do not help the fight against doping and rob a player of the pinnacle of his career.”

The FIFPro spokesperson went on to propose an alternative anti-doping system that protects both the sport’s integrity and the athletes going forward.

“Other sports especially in the United States have proven that in cooperation with the athletes, organized in their unions, effective, fair and strong anti-doping systems can be built,” said Baer-Hoffman.

“We would like to see the start of a process with the other stakeholders to build a system which effectively protects sports’ integrity and does not leave athletes exposed to situations as faced by Paolo Guerrero at this moment.”

WADA was not immediately available for comment.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY